davigno

After upgrading a new hosting plan the previous blog address was unreacheable.

New address is davigno.oxygen-icons.org. Update your bookmarks.

Thanks

The nice guys at OpenUsability have prepared a fantastic icon survey.

This survey will help KDE’s usability experts to point us which icons we should change or improve and which are already good. Thanks very much o everybody which will enter the survey.

PS: it doesn’t take very long, and there are no hard questions.

PPS: For the fews that haven’t seen the link to the survey here you go again :)

http://test.openusability.org/UCCASS/survey.php?sid=43

Dolphin, next KDE 4 file manager, looks for folder icon at “mimetypes/inode-directory.png”. Follow current icon identikit:

• Name: inode-directory.png
• Address: oxygen/…/mymetypes/
• Profession: folder icon

All the special folder icons are located under “places” directory and use a different kind of name having “folder-” as prefix… like “folder-important.png” or “folder-yellow.png”.

So my question is: Shouldn’t the regular folder icon be located under “places” directory as well and be called just “folder.png”?

Looking at freedesktop icon naming specification seems like I’m correct (see Table 11. Standard Place Icons names). Then, the new identikit for the regular folder icon would be:

• Name: folder.png
• Address: oxygen/…/places/

Just to spice up this post a bit the new folder also comes in many different tasty flavors:

And of course most of all the special directories are already on svn too.

Missing are:

• home directory
• packages directory
• binaries/software directory

If you think you have a proposal for a special directory that I haven’t thought of yet, feel free to let me know ;)

Oxygen folders have changed already 3 times since I first started the project back to 2005. That’s because “folders” are really important, and together with “file sheet” and basic actions, they really define the look and feel of the desktop.

First Oxygen folders (the 2 on top of the screenshot below) were really far from what I now consider functional design. They were already very nice icons but the perspective was making them look odd already at 64×64 size. They also lacked some realism in lighting and details.
For these reasons I liked to try with a frontal view, and you got the folder design that has been “official” since yesterday. The new frontal view had less curves, allowing SVG to resize smoothly even at really small resolutions. But the icon was a place holder. Every year, when I look back to the stuff I’ve done, I discover I now can do much better. The folder icon was looking heavy, and was also a really heavy SVG, almost 200 KB. Looking at the vector file I discovered many imprecisions and small errors that I could had avoided. So, instead of fixing it, I thought it was better to completely re-do the design. And now, with much less vectors and nodes, 2 gradients and using gaussian blur for shadow, I got what I really wanted, a light and fresh folder design. I’m sure many users were already fans of the old design, but believe me, try the new folders (it’s already on SVN) for a month and I bet you’ll love them too ;). I hope there won’t be any big changes in the future, but as usual, minor variations may happen.